![PDF](../images/pdftrans.gif)
|
We are reminded that “today
the real has become the new avant-garde” by Nicholas Rombes.
The irony is that as digital technologies are used to deliver ever
greater special effects and fantasies, there is an alternative tendency
to use digital video cameras not to transform reality into some
special effect, but rather to describe the world with increased
realism.
In
a sense as Mr Rombes points out, the new aesthetics - evident in
recent movies shot with digital cameras, such as “Ten”
(Abbas Kiarostami ,2002), “Tape”
(Richard Linklater, 2001) and “Time
Code” (Mike Figgis, 2000), “Russian
Ark” (Aleksandr Sokurov, 2002) - rely on a species of
strict formalism (the long take, the divided frame, etc) to remind
us that reality is the most experimental form of all.
“Russian Ark” constitutes an elaborate continuous 96
minute long take through the Hermitage Museum [ only possible to
achieve with digital cameras, since no film based camera could run
for such a long period with out having to reload film]. “Time
Code” is a series of four separate 97 minute long takes simultaneously
shown in four quadrants. “Ten” is entirely shot (without
the director present) from digital cameras mounted on the dashboard
of a car as it is driven through the streets of Teheran. “Tape”
take place en-tirely in one hotel room. In
a sense, the special effect that the links these digital films to-gether
is reality itself; they are considered experimental or avant-garde
simply because they lack the jump-cut, speed ramp, freeze frame,
CGI aesthetics that now form mass cultural media forms ranging form
television commercials, to music videos, to video games, to television
shows, to mainstream movies.”
When
watching the Trilogy of the Lord of the Rings with my nine year
old son, Julio, he leaned over to me and asked if all those people
marching were real as we were looking at one of those scenes with
thousands of marching warriors. Some twenty years ago we would have
been amazed to learn that indeed they were special effects. Today
we are amazed to learn if such a crowd is, in fact, real. It is
reality that astounds us these days.
As I have been traveling around the world these past months, what
has astounded me is how universal the trend has been to view the
world through the eyes of what has be-come understood as digital
technologies. But these understood for their special effects and
not at all for the possibility to view the real, in new ways.
We live in an increasingly fictionalized world.
On the one hand we have politicians of every stripe possible, all
over the planet, delivering the most preposterous manipulation of
reality with words and images ( they call them photo ops), and on
the other hand we have the conglomerate of news media, from print
to television, also on a world wide ba-sis, contributing in no small
way to fictionalize reality to the extent that news events are sometimes
so deliberately distorted or dramatized that one has a hard time
figuring out what was real.
However
just as in cinema, digital technologies are coming to the aid in
bringing new forms to the medium, we find that in still photography
something similar is starting to emerge.
Photographers who no longer have the need
to cater to the demands by the news me-dia conglomerates and their
dictates for what can and can not be presented to the pub-lic, are
starting to find new venues to show their work. In that sense
the internet has al-lowed many such filters to be lifted, thus we
can deliver information as close to the facts as that might even
be possible.
*
* *
End
of an era © Pedro Meyer, 2004
In
keeping with reality, after more than a decade of not needing to
ever go back into the darkroom to make a print, I decided to finally
pack up all that darkroom equipment and place it storage for my
great great grand children, so that one day they can look at those
strange things with which we once used to make photographs with.
Although I am not nostalgic in the least, I must say that taking
all those items and pack-ing them away was not so easy. After all
many of those things were with me for dec-ades. Now, ask me if I
regret getting rid of these objects, and I must say that not for
a second. I am totally delighted to be able and move on and live
in the digital age, for ever after. During this past decade, not
once was I even tempted to step back into the dark-room. There is
just too much fun to be had in the “light room”.
As I was putting all my darkroom objects in storage, I was also
packing away all those envelopes of photographic paper. Among the
names on these envelopes, Ilford ap-peared. In a peculiar twist
of circumstances, this week also, Ilford was in the process of being
bought out by it’s employees to see if it they can salvage
the firm from financial ruin. Already Hasselblad went through a
similar need to restructure itself, after going through a financial
crisis of it’s own not too long ago. Polaroid was auctioned
off some time back, and Kodak the once dominant name in photography,
the world over, has a market value which is but a fraction of Apple,
a firm that did not even exist in it’s days of glory. Now
we get news that Leitz gmbh, the manufacturers of Leica cameras,
is algo going under as their strategy to enter the digital market
has proven to be one failure af-ter the next, and now the banks
have cut their credit lines after Leitz lost half of it’s
work-ing capital this past year.
In
spite of all the mounting evidence that there is simply no way back
and that analog photography is nothing more than just a period in
the history of photograpy, and that we are only going in one new
direction: which is digital. You will wonder, how it is possible
that if you see all those stalwarts of analog photography come stumbling
down, anyone would still doubt the direction of were photography
is headed.
Yet, believe it or not, that is what still is going on. I am sure
the irony will not escape you, that those who disbelief the most
what is happening, place themselves square in the midst of “
photographic re-alism”. It’ reality what astounds these
days.
Pedro Meyer
Coyoacan, Mexico City
March, 2005
As always please joins us with your comments in our
forums.
-
THE FORUMS ARE UNDER RE-CONSTRUCTION,
SOME OF THE PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS MAY BE MISSING -
|
|