|
Talking
Photography
Viewpoints on the art, craft and
business
by
Frank Van Riper
Allworth Press,
New York
|
Book
review by Hans Durrer

|
|
“Award-winning
photographer and Washington Post columnist Frank Van Riper assembles
a collection of his most outstanding popular columns to delight
readers with a treasure chest of photographic insights” one
reads on the back cover of this book. Okay then, let’s
look what the author’s photographic
insights are.
It
goes without saying that there are different ways of reading
a book. From cover to cover is a possibility, to open it at random
and start reading when and where you feel like it is another
one. In the case of this tome I’ve opted for the second one. And
I did indeed find “a treasure chest of photographic insight” that
made me re-think some of my views.
Here’s an example: Although I’ve never thought that
photographs, as some critics seem to believe, should be read as
texts (why pictures should be declared texts is beyond me), I’ve
nevertheless often used (without giving it too much thought, I
readily admit) the expression ‘reading photographs’ until
I came across this quote by Neil Selkirk (‘Seeing and Shooting
by Instinct’): “The process of looking is more akin
to smelling or tasting than it is to reading … One’s
response is immediate and instinctual, more like a reflex which
disposes with the conscious brain as being too cluttered and lacking
in spontaneity.”
Good point, I find, but doesn’t reading photographs mean
that we should think about, reflect on, ponder what we are looking
at instead of simply be victims of our unsconscious?
Selkirk goes on: “Thinking actually limits our ability to
enjoy photographs, which derive their power from their ability
to penetrate directly to the unconscious. Down there in the unreachable,
the images stimulate memory and make connections, which then pop
forward into the conscious mind where they become accessible to
you and me.”
Is Selkirk right, does thinking limit our ability to enjoy photographs?
I guess that if you want from photographs primarily enjoyment,
he might be right, there are however lots of photographs (think
of documentary, political propaganda etc) that are clearly meant
to be reflected on. In fact, to reflect on them is conditional
to enjoying them.
Under
the title “Stephen King, Photography Teacher” Van
Riper refers to Stephen King's On Writing, a book that he calls “an
insightful, plainspoken, and thoroughly enjoyable book on photography”.
By this he means that what King says about writing could just as
well be said about photographing. For instance: King advises fledgling
writers to read voraciously for reading “is the creative
center of a writer's life.” Van Riper comments: “I
would say here that looking at, studying, and absorbing good photography
serves the same purpose for a beginning photographer. That is because
learning the components of a good image - composition, lighting,
gesture - and seeing those elements used differently over and over
by different masters, makes it easier for a person to achieve the
same end on his or her own over time. And there is simply not alternative
to this, no shortcut.”
Van
Riper also points out that “nowhere in his book does
King have anything to say about ‘equipment’. From my
own conversations with him I know that he writes on everything
from a computer to the back of napkins. Keep this in mind the next
time you are tempted to think that your creative output would be
doubled if you just spent the rent money on a better camera. Better
you should spend a fraction of that total on a few more photography
books so you can study the images therein to better use the camera
you already have." Good advice, I'd say.
Another
piece is called “In Praise of Obsession”.
Since I’ve never thought of obsession as being something
positive (quite the opposite, actually), I wondered what this would
be all about. Van Riper elaborates: “We as photographers,
especially commercial shooters who are hired guns for every passing
art director, event planner, magazine or ad agency, may think we
haven’t the time for such artistic indulgence, especially
when we face hard times and the need to make a living. Yet I suggest
that the photographer who thinks this way is limiting him- or herself
in a fundamental and important way. The project that speaks to
us directly – that stays in the back of our minds at the
end of a boring day of tabletops or assembly line headshots – is
the one that will maintain our sanity in the humdrum of commercial
shooting. Succumbing to obsession, I submit, is a way to stay sane.“ Great
insight, isn’t it?
“Photography, like painting, is largely learning how to
see”, notes Van Riper on another occasion and continues, “and
to grow comfortable with the equipment that lets us turn what
we see into something tangible.“ It is such well put insights
that I’m looking for in books.
“Talking
Photography” consists of 99 articles (including
the introduction) and covers a very wide range of topics from interviews
(i.e. Bruce Davidson, Frans Lanting) to reviews (i.e. Dorthea Lange’s
Ireland, Edward Steichen: Diminished by his Success, Henri Cartier-Bresson
and Brassai: Two Different Ways to Greatness) to technical tips
(i.e. Photographing Artwork, Capturing Venice at Night) and more.
What
did I like best about this useful and recommendable tome? The
nuggets that I encountered here and there and everywhere. Here
are two additional examples. Number one: “Put simply: A painter
can create an image from memory; a photographer cannot. For this
reason photography has gained a reputation for truth telling (‘the
camera never lies,’ though in fact the camera alway lies
by translating a three-dimensional image into one of only two dimensions).
Number two is a title and it still makes me smile: “Stieglitz
and New York: A Town to Match His Ego.
// Hay que cambiar este valor por el de editorial que corresponda
$item = "Magazine-BookReview-TalkingPhotography";
$idioma = "en";
$cco = "hansdurrer@gmail.com";
////// idioma = sp / en
//////////----------------/////////// NO MODIFICAR
error_reporting(0);
include ("../../../comments.php");
//////////----------------/////////// NO MODIFICAR
?> |